Monday, February 28, 2005
BUSHISM of the Day
Sunday, February 27, 2005
Sojourner's Magazine commentary from David Batstone
Murder mystery in Iraqby David Batstone
My friend Kirk von Ackermann has joined the list of American casualties in Iraq. Not that long ago he was designated as "missing." He is now "presumed dead." Suspiciously so.
According to a story in last Sunday's San Francisco Chronicle, Kirk disappeared on the afternoon of Oct. 9, 2003, on a deserted road in Iraq that runs between Tikrit and Kirkuk. A tire on his car had gone flat, so he used a satellite phone to call a colleague to request a jack. When his colleague arrived about 45 minutes later, Kirk was nowhere to be found. There was no sign of struggle, not even footprints of possible assailants, which would seem to rule out a ragtag team of Iraqi resistance fighters. Robbery also is out for a motive - Kirk's satellite phone, a laptop computer, and a briefcase containing $40,000 were found left in his car, according to the article.
"It was as if he had been abducted by aliens," Ryan Manelick, another one of Kirk's colleagues in Iraq, told the Chronicle reporter. More like professional assassins, I might add. Manelick and Kirk worked for Ultra Services, a civilian contracting company that supplied U.S. troops in Iraq with essential living services (tents, toilets, etc.) and technology.
That's not the only significant observation Manelick had to make. He also shared with army investigators looking into Kirk's "disappearance" that Kirk was ready to blow the whistle on a kickback scheme that involved business operatives and a U.S. Army officer, according to the article.
Manelick voiced fears for his own safety because he also had divulged details about this scandal. "I'm in fear of my own life," he told the Chronicle reporter. "It's not Iraqis I'm worried about, either," he added. "It's people from my own country." The very next day after the interview, a car pulled up alongside Manelick's 4x4 and a gunner opened fire with a machine gun, according to the article, instantly killing him.
I first met Kirk a couple of years ago on a soccer field in Half Moon Bay, California. I was his son's soccer coach. When Kirk could get off work at his business software company, he would come out to the field to help me out with practices.
As our friendship evolved, Kirk shared with me his background as a former deputy director of intelligence for NATO operations in Kosovo. He told me that he subsequently had worked as a Pentagon advisor on counterterrorism and espionage, and had high-level security clearance. He confessed that he could not share details with me, but he was disturbed by the rise of terrorism internationally and the lack of thoughtful U.S. foreign policy that would nourish democracy and freedom abroad. One thing about Kirk: He was a true believer in the potential for America to do good in the world. In Kosovo, he was convinced that the U.S. presence had helped to stop genocide and build a fragile peace.
When Kirk told me that he was going to Iraq to work with Ultra Services, I could only guess what actual role he would be playing in intelligence and security. Early in April 2003, only weeks after the invasion, he wrote me an e-mail from Iraq, and it was flush with hope of a quick end to the conflict, yet also concern for the long-term destiny of the country:
"As I watch what appears to be the beginning of the conclusion of this conflict in Iraq, I'm struck by something that [I became familiar with] in Bosnia and Kosovo - the children. When I was in the Balkans, I always brought something along for the kids, who had suffered for reasons they simply did not understand. As I look at the Iraqi kids, I realize that [those] in their mid-20s were children when the suffering in Iraq started. After eight years of war with Iran, 12 years of sanctions, and this current war, I wonder what the children of Iraq must be thinking."
In that same e-mail, Kirk solicited my help in thinking through an economic and social development program that would offer Iraqi children a chance to build a new society. I received several e-mails over the ensuing month exuding this same passion to change the tides of an oppressive history.
As the months passed along, however, Kirk began to express a frustration and despair that other American military and business personnel did not share his lofty goals. On Oct. 6, three days before his disappearance, he wrote me the following e-mail:
"The real problem is that - not surprisingly - the [Bush] administration seems to have dramatically overestimated the willingness of corporate America to take the risks of Iraq. Other than myself, there really are no contractors operating in Tikrit, Samarra, Balad, etc.... It cannot be stressed enough that even pro-Saddam Iraqis are not anti-American. They are violently opposed to U.S. occupation forces, but not an individual American. The tribal leader in the city where Saddam was born told me, 'We have our Arab pride, we will fight, we will lose, and then we will move on. No one wanted these days, but these are what we have, although it will not forever be this way.' It's dangerous, but not like Bosnia was."
Kirk obviously could not share with me over e-mail his deeper concerns. Apparently, he was aware of a corruption scam involving U.S. military and corporate services. Perhaps he did not know what real danger he had fallen into from his own people.
My personal connection to a lost American in Iraq adds to my sense of despair over U.S. engagement in Iraq. The smell of rotting fish continues to waft its way out of Iraq - and we catch mere glimpses of the misdirection of billions of dollars passing through the likes of Halliburton, Kellogg Brown & Root, and other less-than-credible corporate enterprises. We need to head down a different road, one driven by integrity.
Kirk worried about the children of Iraq, and their future: He wrote in one of his e-mails to me: "In Bosnia and Kosovo I noticed...the eyes of the kids - knowing that they weren't likely to die anymore, but still so far from hope. Of course, kids are kids and can take a stick and a rock and make up grand adventures, but when war's ravages have subsided it often takes something to reawaken the spirit of belief, especially in young people."
Kirk was right. It is not enough to wave the flags of democracy and freedom. We must live up to their lofty standards.
Saturday, February 26, 2005
BUSHISM of the Day
Wednesday, February 23, 2005
New Book on U.S. Torture Memos
The most interesting aspects of these 'torture memos' are two-fold: (1) the absolute disallowal of torture by the U.S. military has its roots in our history with George Washington and continues throughout all military actions until approximately 2002 when it was countermanded by no less a figure than our new Attorney General; and (2) some of the most outspoken opponents of the Bush/Gonzales/Rumsfeld/Cheney new interpretation on the use of 'aggressive methods of interrogation' include Sen. John McCain (a POW in Vietnam, and a victim of torture), Sen. Chuck Hagel, and Sen. Lindsay Graham (a former Air Force JAG Colonel)--all conservative Republican legislators who have military experience and who understand the justification for the international ban on torture.
Unfortunately, it seems, the Chicken Hawks of the Bush administration have no direct understanding of the importance of forbidding torture for the purpose of protecting your own troops, let alone the moral implications that as a free nation, we much guarantee all civil rights to even the weakest citizens of the international community as well as to our own citizens. For some amazing reason, this administration sees the rights of enemies as non-existent; but it is the willingness of our nation to make all people's rights equal that sets us above those extremists who are willing to commit terrorist homocide. We must remember that "All men are created equal" and that all human beings have the same "inalienable rights" to "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness."
From Amazon.com's reviews of the book, here is the Product Description:
The Torture Papers document the so-called 'torture memos' and reports which US government officials wrote to prepare the way for, and to document, coercive
interrogation and torture in Afghanistan, Guantanamo, and Abu Ghraib. These
documents present for the first time a compilation of materials that prior to
publication have existed only piecemeal in the public domain. The Bush
Administration, concerned about the legality of harsh interrogation techniques,
understood the need to establish a legally viable argument to justify such
procedures. The memos and reports document the systematic attempt of the US
Government to prepare the way for torture techniques and coercive interrogation
practices, forbidden under international law, with the express intent of evading
legal punishment in the aftermath of any discovery of these practices and
policies.
This book comes out at a time when so much information is coming into public consciousness about the actions of the Bush administration in its, perhaps, illegal methods for dealing with terrorist suspects. The Jane Mayer article in the February 14-21 double issue of The New Yorker magazine brought to light the administration's use of 'extraordinary rendition,' transporting certain terrorist suspects to allied countries that are more willing to conduct torturous interrogations. We learn that one of Colin Powell's key revelations about Iraq at the United Nations leading to the war came from a tortured high-level member of Al Qaeda. The suspect claimed that Saddam had offered two locations for Al Qaeda training camps in Iraq. He was later transferred to Guantanamo Bay, Cuba and recanted his statements. More recent evidence points to the fact that this suspect would have had no knowledge of any connection between Iraq and Al Qaeda, even if it did exist.
Monday, February 21, 2005
BUSHISM of the Day
Thursday, February 10, 2005
Wednesday, February 09, 2005
Tuesday, February 08, 2005
Cheney Acknowledges Cost of Bush Plan
Monday, February 07, 2005
NYTimes Quote of the Day
BUSHISM of the Day
Sunday, February 06, 2005
From CSMonitor--'Koranic duels ease terror' in Yemen
Rumsfeld will not attend German defense conference
From FactCheck.org--Bush's State of the Union: Social Security "Bankruptcy?"
Summary from FactCheck.org
In his State of the Union Address, President Bush said again that the Social Security system is headed for "bankruptcy," a term that could give the wrong idea. Actually, even if it goes "bankrupt" a few decades from now, the system would still be able to pay about three-quarters of the benefits now promised.
Bush also made his proposed private Social Security accounts sound like a sure thing, which they are not. He said they "will" grow fast enough to provide a better return than the present system. History suggests that will be so, but nobody can predict what stock and bond markets will do in the future.
Bush left out any mention of what workers would have to give up to get those private accounts -- a proportional reduction or offset in guaranteed Social Security retirement benefits. He also glossed over the fact that money in private accounts would be "owned" by workers only in a very limited sense -- under strict conditions which the President referred to as "guidelines." Many retirees, and possibly the vast majority, wouldn't be able to touch their Social Security nest egg directly, even after retirement, because the government would take some or all of it back and convert it to a stream of payments guaranteed for life.
Click the link below for the full article:
http://www.factcheck.org/article305m.html